I
know that some have questioned Paul’s approach with his “unknown god” sermon in
Athens (Acts 17). As I have been reflecting on this alongside of the admonition
to make our defense of our hope in Christ “with gentleness and reverence,” (1
Peter 3:16), I am inclined to think that was exactly what Paul was trying to
do. When he came to Athens, Paul was “deeply distressed that the city was full
of idols.” (Acts 17:16) When his teaching evoked an invitation to speak in the
Areopagus, Paul did not castigate them for the idolatry he found so
distressing, but sought to engage them by starting in their context with a “gentle
and reverent” approach. It was the proclamation of the resurrection (vv. 18,
32) that became the watershed.
What
if we who follow Jesus chose to articulate our opinions in this volatile,
divisive time with “gentleness and reverence”? I know politics and the Gospel
are different, but it seems to me that when we who identify with Jesus express
vitriolic political opinions, that undermines opportunity to proclaim the hope
of the Gospel with “gentleness and reverence.” I do believe we who follow Jesus
can and should speak to the issues of justice and peace, compassion and mercy
in our violent, angry world. But if we let our “deep distress” at current
issues overshadow “gentleness and reverence,” we undermine the credibility of
our witness to the hope of the Gospel.
No comments:
Post a Comment