This
week, as I have been reflecting on the lectionary Gospel reading for Sunday
(John 20:19-31) I found myself jumping to Luke 24 with the story of Jesus
meeting the two on the road to Emmaus. When Jesus vanished after they
recognized him, they hurried back to Jerusalem to tell the other disciples.
(Luke 24:33-35). Just as they were reporting this, Jesus’ appeared (v. 36).
This seems to be the same moment as John 20:19. Presumably the disciples opened
the door to let in the two returning from Emmaus, though locked it before Jesus
entered. I don’t know that this necessarily has any profound significance, but
I enjoy exploring the interlink between these two narratives, neither of which
are reported in Matthew or Mark.
For
a long time I have also been fascinated by speculating about who it was Jesus
met on the road to Emmaus. Many artistic representations show two men on the
road or at the table with Jesus. I know I am not alone in finding that highly
unlikely. The text only says “two” and only names on of them, “Cleopas.” For
two men in Judea at that time to have had a shared household would have been
very rare. I am also not alone in speculating that the unnamed one was Cleopas’
wife. The convention of referring to a couple by the marital surname (e.g. The
Stolpes meaning Norm and Candy) had not been established. Thus, referring to
the husband by name would have identified the couple.
I
have another highly speculative idea that the only scholars I have read who
comment on it at all reject. I suppose that if some scholars felt they needed
to reject it, someone else must have asked about it. But I wonder if the woman
was Mary the wife of Clopas (John 19:25). To me, the variation in spelling –
Clopas/Cleopas – seems small and incidental, but I am speculating in an area I know
nothing about. Again, I am not suggesting any profound significance, but I do
find imaginative explorations seem to invite me deeper into the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment