Saturday, February 29, 2020

Immigration Perspective



Immigration has become a volatile, high profile issue in recent years. In the current political environment, two sides seem to be hurling invectives at each other, describing those who do not agree with them in caricatures that evade having any sort of reasonable conversation. “You just want open boarders that let in criminals, rapists, drugs and human traffickers.” “You are xenophobic and racist and want to keep out people with brown skin and different cultures and religions.” “Yes, most of our ancestors were immigrants, but they came here legally.” “Current laws and policies are inhumane and unjust.”
As I write I hope not to be enmeshed in such name calling, but express my perspective in a way that can help both those who agree with me and those who do not to think and dialog constructively. My perspective is shaped in these areas: biblical, personal/family, pastoral, historical, justice/legal, humanitarian.
Biblical
 Anyone who knows me at all would know I would start with biblical material which would be the lens through which I would view every other area. Let me be clear, as is the case in so many areas, the US is not equivalent with ancient Israel, so humility and caution are required in discerning how people of the Book (Jews and Christians) work out and advocate for biblical principles in our very different context which is rightly a secular, pluralistic society.
With that in mind I make these disclaimers. While the biblical mandate is for welcoming justice for aliens, foreigners, and strangers, both the Mosaic Law and the Hebrew Prophets were concerned that the Hebrews not absorb or adopt the idolatrous practices and thinking of their pagan neighbors. Those concerns were for the spiritual purity of the community in covenant with the Lord (YHWH = “I AM” God’s personal name, indicated in many Bible translations with the use of large and small capital letters). Rahab (Joshua 2, 6; Hebrews 11:31; James 2:25) and Ruth are prominent among a number of examples that make clear that the issue was not racial, ethnic, or national purity.
At the time of the dispersion of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and captivity of the Southern Kingdom of Judah, the prophets indicated that for them to fall to foreigners was a humiliating judgment for their idolatry. Interspersed with this, the prophets recognized that some of these pagans could actually turn to the Lord and be welcome in the community of faith. Thus, the concern about foreigners was spiritual not racial, ethnic, or national.
While the Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, Isaac, Jacob and his sons) were not immigrants as we would think of that today, they were migratory nomads dependent on the hospitality of the settled communities among whom they lived. The clan became a nation in their time in Egypt. At first they were welcomed guests and cared for with compassion and generosity. But as they grew more numerous the Egyptians (especially those in positions of power) felt threatened by them and enslaved them. The time in Egypt became a defining model for how Israel was to treat the aliens in their midst. Be hospitable to aliens as the Egyptians were with you at first. Don’t treat aliens unjustly as the Egyptians eventually did to you.
I have assembled a compilation of biblical references to how aliens were to be treated in ancient Israel, largely but not exclusively from the Mosaic Law. I will not attempt to exegete each of them, but they are listed at the end, and I believe speak for themselves. Clearly, this concern for how to treat aliens is not an isolated line or two but a pervasive theme that I believe needs to be taken seriously. I know it does not spell out what kind of immigration policies a country like the US should have today, but I do believe it sets a divine, defining priority and mandate.
It seems to me that as a nation of immigrants, except for the remnants of the displaced native peoples, we ought to be able to resonate with the repeated reminders to ancient Israel that they were aliens in Egypt. We who are People of the Book (Jews and Christians) have both opportunity and responsibility to give prominent visibility to this parallel: just as the ancient Israelites were to treat aliens in their midst with hospitality and justice, so the US should be treating today’s immigrants with hospitality and justice, knowing that (almost) everyone’s forbearers came here as immigrants. 
Personal/Family
 Though I know these folk are present throughout the country, during our seventeen years in New Jersey I was more aware of those who traced their ancestry to before the American Revolution. For some claiming to have descended from someone who came over on the Mayflower was a point of considerable pride. Just as the Israelites lost track of their roots as aliens in Egypt over the centuries, four centuries of European settlement in what is now the US can fade awareness of immigrate status into heroic stories long distant from current realities.
For me, the immigrant past is more immediate. I am only the second generation born in the US. I personally knew and interacted with many in my grandparents’ generation who had immigrated to the US, generally as young adults. My sister and I have artifacts that they brought with them from the “old country.” I am very aware that our children and grandchildren are less attached to them than we are.
One part of my family’s story makes today’s immigration debates very personal for me. According to family lore (acknowledging I don’t have documentation for everything) which came through listening especially to my grandmother who lived with us for 13 years after Grandpa Erikson died. He grew up on Marstrand, a small island at the south tip of Sweden which was a fishing village then. On its high point was a long abandoned fort, apparently to keep the Danes from invading. It has since become a resort community. It its days as a harbor, my grandfather, Gustav Ragnar Erikson, hired onto a ship at 16 years old and “ran away to sea,” never to return to home or Sweden. The story is that he sailed around the Horn and back and forth between Asia and California. I do have jade bookends that he purportedly brought back.
As the story unfolds, when docked in San Francisco Bay, he “jumped ship” and didn’t go back. He was an illegal alien more or less on the run, making his way with wit and brawn as a hard living, hard fighting, hard drinking young sailor far from home. Without getting into the whole story here (it is in my book Ripples, www.ripplesthroughlives.com), Jesus met him through an encounter with the Salvation Army and a young woman named Mathilda. By marrying her he was able to get his status changed to what we could call “legal” today. They had a son named Clarence. Sadly (at the time, though it was essential to my even being born) both Mathilda and Clarence died of flu. Now a young widower, he found his way to what was then the First Swedish Baptist Church of Oakland, California. It was known as Lakeside Baptist Church when I grew up there. My grandmother, Annetta Josephine Olson, was there and in her late 30s considered herself a “hopeless old maid.” Once they met, they wasted little time getting married and having their only child, my mother, Helen Doris Erikson.
My father’s father, Gustav Ragnar Stolpe, also came to the US from Sweden. His older sister Anna was already living in Connecticut and “sponsored” him. After that, one by one three other brothers, the youngest sister, and their father all came to the US in what would today be considered “chain migration.” He came at 16, at least in part to avoid the military draft as Europe was moving to the brink of World War I (they called it The Great War, not thinking there would be two of them). Though Sweden was neutral, they did maintain an army with universal conscription. My Grandpa Stolpe’s family were Baptists in largely Lutheran Sweden. Whether he was a conscientious pacifist or not, the Baptists did not want to fight for a Lutheran king. Many Swedish Baptists came to the US at that time for those reasons and fueled the growth of what was then called the Swedish Baptist Conference, which became the Baptist General Conference in which I grew up.
World War II introduced other variables and ways of thinking for my parents’ generation. My mother had been engaged to a young man who was a reconnaissance photographer flying in the transparent dome underneath an airplane. He was killed when the plane belly landed. I know almost nothing else about that story. But my father, in keeping with his father’s attitudes, did not want to be part of combat in WWII, so enlisted in the Navy as a medic/corpsman (I’m not sure which language is actually correct, he used both) and was a pharmacist mate second class on discharge. He was stationed at Oak Knoll Naval Hospital in Oakland, California where they both prepared troops to go to the Pacific theater and received and cared for the wounded from there. He worshiped with Lakeside Baptist Church. My Erikson grandparents habitually had young servicemen for dinner after church, knowing they were far from home. They may have also hoped one would be right for their daughter. So that was how my parents met and married before my father was shipped to Okinawa to set up medical facilities to receive the hosts of wounded from the anticipated invasion of Japan’s main island, which was precluded by the atomic bomb. He returned in December 1945, and I was born in September 1946, so they didn’t waste any time either.
Now at 73 years old, looking back on 51 years of marriage and all the adventures along the way, I am increasingly amazed at the twists and turns of life. What if during his wild years as an illegal alien, run away sailor my Grandpa Erikson had gotten in enough trouble to be jailed, or if today’s policies had sent him back to Sweden? What if today’s aversion to practices such as “chain migration” and “anchor babies” had split up this young family? What if Mathilda and Clarence hadn’t died of the flu? What is my mother’s first love had come back to marry her? Any of those and any number of lesser events, and I would not have been born. Someone would have, and they would have had different stories to tell. I can’t evade pondering how today’s immigration practices are dramatically altering many other people’s lives.
Pastoral
When I was serving First Presbyterian Church of Mt. Holly, New Jersey, I served the Rancocas Valley Clergy Association as the volunteer Human Services Secretary with the Salvation Army. After my first year at that, I went to community college and took two semesters of Spanish. Many of the people who came seeking assistance were from Central American and speaking English was a challenge for them. So I determined I’d learn enough Spanish so I was the one struggling with language, and would make it a little easier for them. I heard some rather harrowing stories of how they got to New Jersey and how they were getting their families up and running here. The immigration issue was not as volatile then (1980-1997) as it is now, but I did gain some insight into the challenges they faced to escape violence and chaos.
Then I came to be pastor of Central Christian Church in Dallas, Texas and did five interim pastorates when I “retired.” (4 in TX, 1 in OK) Between the location and the changing mood on the country, immigration had a high profile almost everywhere I turned (2000-2017). That congregation had several families from Belize. Some were fully documented immigrants, and others were in various stages of non-compliance. Some were deported. I made pastoral visits to some who were in detention before being deported. These experiences moved me from considering my opinion about immigration policy to involvement in the lives of people and families whom I had come to know and love.
Historical
Honestly recognizing that the US is a “nation of immigrants” requires acknowledging that the American continents were not vacant when the Europeans began arriving here. Native populations had some very sophisticated levels of culture, art, learning, and government. Displacement of them perhaps started with naïve ignorance, but as Europeans spread it became genocidal. I don’t want to get into how to address those past injustices under current conditions, but not acknowledging that distorts how immigration if viewed today.
I have heard some suggestions that identify the earlier Europeans in what is now the US as settlers and more recent arrivals as immigrants. To imply that “settlers” were legitimate, but “immigrants” are not strikes me as disingenuous at best. At the time of the westward expansion of the US, my ancestors were still in Europe (Sweden as far as I know, though I do know of some connections in Germany and France), so those of us in the US would have to be counted in the immigrants of the 20th century. While “our people” were not directly involved in the injustices that cleared the continent for European settlement, we are nevertheless beneficiaries of that history and should approach our attitudes with great humility in pursuit of contemporary justice.
As northern Europeans, when my grandparents’ generation immigrated to the US, they had a much easier time of it that those who came from southern and eastern Europe, not to mention those who have come from Asia and Africa. Stress and injustice in the treatment of immigrants is hardly new. At the time of the Irish Potato Famine (1845-1849) many Irish came to the US hoping to escape death by starvation. A little later, more Irish were brought to the US to work on the Transcontinental Railroad (completed 1869). Both those fleeing famine and those whose labor was no longer needed on the railroad were met with great hostility and injustice. They were denied employment and housing. Many businesses would not serve them. Signs that said “No Irish Need Apply” were common. Besides the general suspicion of immigrants, some of this may have been an extension of the long generations of English domination of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
On the west coast, Chinese were brought to the US to build the Transcontinental Railroad. They, too, were unwelcome once their labor was not needed. Chinese enclaves formed in major cities, not just on the West Coast but spreading eastward to seek something better than the hostility faced in places like California. The neighborhood in which I grew up in Oakland, California had a substantial Jewish population in my pre-teen years. In my junior high years that turned over to become a highly Chinese neighborhood. Some of that was as families left their ethnic ghettos and became more integrated in the wider society. Among the neighbors I knew, this was a manifestation of “chain migration.” As families settled into the community, they would watch for suitable houses to come on the market and send to Hong Kong or Taiwan to sponsor others from their extended families or communities. Our neighborhood was transformed by “chain migration” in a matter of 3-4 years. Their children were my playmates and classmates and friends. One cultural observation that I hope doesn’t imply a racist bias: both the Jewish and Chinese communities highly valued education and excellence. Among my Gentile and friends of European descent, we acknowledged that having Jewish or Chinese classmates raised the level of academic competition and performance.
Immigrants from eastern (e.g. Poland) and southern (e.g. Italy) Europe was also met with considerable discrimination as they came to the US. Like the Irish, much of this was a prejudice against Roman Catholics. The persistence of those attitudes was evident in the 1960 presidential election and concerns about John Kennedy, which I remember very well. Before the US entered World War II, many Jews who were seeking to escape the lethal antisemitism of Nazi Germany so nowhere in Europe was safe, were denied entry into the US. While not structured into law the way Jim Crow was after the Civil War, antisemitism in the US made life difficult for Jews and is still an issue today.
Much of the emotion in the current discussions of immigration in the US have to do with those coming from Central America (and some other Latin American countries). Having lived in both California and Texas, I am very aware that these states (plus Arizona and New Mexico) were once intrinsic parts of Mexico, and some families’ roots go back to those days. They did not leave Mexico to come to the US; rather, the US took over, and they were suddenly in a different country. Their descendants today have connections with family who are in Mexico. Beside this, for generations agriculture (from farms to packing plants) have brought in labor from south of the border. Beyond that, many manual labor intensive businesses (from construction to assembly line) have welcomed and depended on low wage labor. Both of the Bush Presidents championed guest worker programs and other polities so businesses could capitalize on the Hispanic labor force, which is ironic now with the anxiety that immigrants are taking the jobs of US citizens. In high school and college I rode Greyhound bus a number of times for church related activities, and saw lots of migrant farm workers following the planting and harvest seasons. I would also observe that plenty of US citizens and permanent residents would not fare well in many of those agricultural and manual labor jobs. Working in the fields for 10 hours a day, six days a week, month after month, year after year is nothing at all comparable to a family outing to a “U Pick” strawberry farm.
Justice/Legal
I am neither a lawyer nor a legislator, so I will not presume to prescribe immigration law and policy. However, I am aware that immigration laws and policies have been changing considerably from when my grandparents’ generation came to the US and noticeable since the Bush presidencies. Things that were legal then are now considered to be illegal. The people seeking refuge in the US have not changed as much as the laws to which they are subjected have changed. To object to today’s immigrants by saying that “my ancestors” or previous generations of immigrants “came here legally,” fails to recognize that “legal” is defined by the laws that are enacted, not by the people who are immigrating. While those who snuck across the border have always been something of a problem, the large numbers being held in detention right now were seeking legal asylum and have been denied what is largely considered an international human right.
Again, drug traffic and human trafficking are real and serious issues. Very little of that comes across the border by individuals and small groups sneaking across and through the desert. That comes through clandestine crossings at established boarder points and through networks of tunnels. The profitability of these enterprises enables their practitioners to keep working to stay ahead of the ever growing detection and interdiction mechanisms. In no way intending to excuse any of this but if these ceased to be profitable enterprises, they would wither quickly. They are profitable because of the economic supply from people of substantial means and those in the US and other “advanced” countries who deal in that traffic. Having dealt with the drug issues at a local level, I know simple solutions evade us, but we need to recognize that our society is enmeshed with these most sordid aspect of immigration.
In a slightly different direction, something that I know about first hand, especially from my time in Texas, is that many of those who have been “illegal” or “undocumented” (choose your own preferred language) did not sneak across the border but came with legal visas for vacation, study, or work. But when their visas expired, they never went back. Some of them have been here for many years. They have married and raised families. They have jobs and pay taxes. They own homes. Yes, some have managed to create a sufficient paper trail to protect themselves from deportation, even if not fully legal. Yes, by marrying and having children, some have been able to use the system to get legal documentation and even citizenship. An interesting, if ironic side note here, is that if they didn’t get proper participation in Social Security, though they pay into the system, they will never be able to collect any benefits. This is true of DACA (“dreamers”) who were brought here illegally as children. Current policies (under review and modification at this time) allow them to attend school and hold jobs, in which they pay FICA, but forbids them from ever claiming any benefits. Again, a lot of emotional complaints are made about illegal immigrants coming into the US to get welfare benefits of various kinds. Federal law prohibits those who are not here legally from receiving any government benefits. I’m sure some find their way around that, but the law is clear.
Humanitarian
While immigration from Muslim countries is a concern in some parts of the US, it is a symptom of a gigantic, global humanitarian crisis. Interpreting this as a condemnation of all Muslim people is a grave injustice. The violence that plagues many areas of the world with large Muslim populations has little if anything to do with religion. Muslims are killing Muslims in the pursuit of power. Some, such as those from South Sudan who have come to Minnesota, make it to the US, but Europe is reeling under the pressure of immigrants seeking safety from violence. I will not try to get into explaining Islam (not that I am knowledgeable enough to do that), but I will observe that the forces of violence prompting such great migration out of some Muslim areas is not that different from the gang, drug, and power violence that is driving so many to flee Central America to find some modicum of safety in the US. The struggles over immigration in the US are but a microcosm of this global humanitarian crisis.
Immigration policy that seeks only to keep that crisis beyond our borders strikes me as immoral. My own limited experience in Honduras and my son Jon’s and daughter-in-law’s experience in Guatemala (Jon’s is a bit wider but does not make him an expert) brings some understanding of the desperation of people who will leave everything they have known to go where they are being told they are not welcome to find some relief from the violence and chaos that surrounds and threatens them every day. In some way, addressing these forces that drive people to take such great risks at such great cost, calls for engagement in the causes in both Central America and in Muslim areas. I am not suggesting that the US or Europe or The West is responsible for those problems, but rather than trying to insulate ourselves from them, we have both obligation and opportunity to do something better about them. To be clear, I am not advocating military intervention or regime change (the mess in Iran surely demonstrates the folly of such approaches). Rather, I suggest the creative hard work of engaging as humans with compassion for each other.
I want to conclude with a very personal story that, to me, illustrates the profound challenges of immigration in our time.
In one church I was serving (in this century, just so you know it is not dredged up from antiquity – though for obvious reasons I must be sure identities cannot be traced), at a community outreach event, I young man spoke to me and made an appointment to come and see me. He and his wife had come from a Muslim area for doctoral studies in the US. At least one of their two children was born here. If I remember right, he had finished his studies and was working in his field while his wife finished her studies. Even before they left their homeland, they had reservations about Islam, though did not pursue them. But here in the US they met some Christians and began to investigate Jesus. He said to me he wanted to leave Islam behind and follow Jesus. Could I help him learn about Jesus? I got him started reading the Gospels, and we got together several times to talk about what he was learning. One day he came to me to say that he was afraid for their lives. If they went back to their homeland and acknowledged they were following Jesus, they would be killed, even at the hands of their family. They were afraid that agents from their homeland could find them in the US and kill them without facing consequences. When his wife’s studies completed, they were expected to return to their homeland, but so far they had been unsuccessful in getting their student visas changed. After I had finished my pastorate at that church, he phoned me and wanted to see me again. He thanked me for my friendship and for helping him and his family get to know Jesus. He asked me to continue to pray for them. As an expression of their thanks, he gave me a brass pitcher that was characteristic of his culture (I suppose that’s descriptive enough) that he had a jeweler engrave with my name, in English on one side and in Arabic on the other. It sits on our mantle today as a prayer reminder.

Biblical Appendix
Exodus 12.49:
There shall be one law for the native and for the alien who resides among you.

Exodus 20.10:

But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the alien resident in your towns.

Exodus 22.21:

You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt.

Exodus 23.9:

You shall not oppress a resident alien; you know the heart of an alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt.

Exodus 23.12:

Six days you shall do your work, but on the seventh day you shall rest, so that your ox and your donkey may have relief, and your homeborn slave and the resident alien may be refreshed.

Leviticus 16.29:

This shall be a statute to you forever: In the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, you shall deny yourselves, and shall do no work, neither the citizen nor the alien who resides among you

Leviticus 19.10:

You shall not strip your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am the Lord your God.

Leviticus 19.33:

When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien.

Leviticus 19.34:

The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.

Leviticus 23.22:

When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest; you shall leave them for the poor and for the alien: I am the Lord your God.

Leviticus 24.22:

You shall have one law for the alien and for the citizen: for I am the Lord your God.

Numbers 9.14:

Any alien residing among you who wishes to keep the passover to the Lord shall do so according to the statute of the passover and according to its regulation; you shall have one statute for both the resident alien and the native.

Numbers 15.14:

An alien who lives with you, or who takes up permanent residence among you, and wishes to offer an offering by fire, a pleasing odor to the Lord, shall do as you do.

Numbers 15.15:

As for the assembly, there shall be for both you and the resident alien a single statute, a perpetual statute throughout your generations; you and the alien shall be alike before the Lord.

Numbers 15.16:

You and the alien who resides with you shall have the same law and the same ordinance.

Deuteronomy 1.16:

I charged your judges at that time: “Give the members of your community a fair hearing, and judge rightly between one person and another, whether citizen or resident alien.

Deuteronomy 5.14:

But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, or your son or your daughter, or your male or female slave, or your ox or your donkey, or any of your livestock, or the resident alien in your towns, so that your male and female slave may rest as well as you.

Deuteronomy 24.14:

You shall not withhold the wages of poor and needy laborers, whether other Israelites or aliens who reside in your land in one of your towns.

Deuteronomy 24.17:

You shall not deprive a resident alien or an orphan of justice; you shall not take a widow’s garment in pledge.

Deuteronomy 24.19:

When you reap your harvest in your field and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it; it shall be left for the alien, the orphan, and the widow, so that the Lord your God may bless you in all your undertakings.

Deuteronomy 24.20:
When you beat your olive trees, do not strip what is left; it shall be for the alien, the orphan, and the widow.

Deuteronomy 24.21:

When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, do not glean what is left; it shall be for the alien, the orphan, and the widow.

Deuteronomy 26.11:

Then you, together with the Levites and the aliens who reside among you, shall celebrate with all the bounty that the Lord your God has given to you and to your house.

Deuteronomy 26.12:

When you have finished paying all the tithe of your produce in the third year (which is the year of the tithe), giving it to the Levites, the aliens, the orphans, and the widows, so that they may eat their fill within your towns,

Deuteronomy 26.13:

Then you shall say before the Lord your God: “I have removed the sacred portion from the house, and I have given it to the Levites, the resident aliens, the orphans, and the widows, in accordance with your entire commandment that you commanded me; I have neither transgressed nor forgotten any of your commandments:

Deuteronomy 27.19:

“Cursed be anyone who deprives the alien, the orphan, and the widow of justice.” All the people shall say, “Amen!”

Deuteronomy 31.12:

Assemble the people—men, women, and children, as well as the aliens residing in your towns—so that they may hear and learn to fear the Lord your God and to observe diligently all the words of this law,

Joshua 8.35:

There was not a word of all that Moses commanded that Joshua did not read before all the assembly of Israel, and the women, and the little ones, and the aliens who resided among them.

2 Chronicles 30.25:

The whole assembly of Judah, the priests and the Levites, and the whole assembly that came out of Israel, and the resident aliens who came out of the land of Israel, and the resident aliens who lived in Judah, rejoiced.

Jeremiah 7.6:

If you do not oppress the alien, the orphan, and the widow, or shed innocent blood in this place, and if you do not go after other gods to your own hurt,

Jeremiah 22.3:

Thus says the Lord: Act with justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor anyone who has been robbed. And do no wrong or violence to the alien, the orphan, and the widow, or shed innocent blood in this place.

Ezekiel 22.29:

The people of the land have practiced extortion and committed robbery; they have oppressed the poor and needy, and have extorted from the alien without redress.

Ezekiel 47.22:

You shall allot it as an inheritance for yourselves and for the aliens who reside among you and have begotten children among you. They shall be to you as citizens of Israel; with you they shall be allotted an inheritance among the tribes of Israel.

Ezekiel 47.23:

In whatever tribe aliens reside, there you shall assign them their inheritance, says the Lord God.

Zechariah 7.10:

Do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the alien, or the poor; and do not devise evil in your hearts against one another.

Malachi 3.5:

Then I will draw near to you for judgment; I will be swift to bear witness against the sorcerers, against the adulterers, against those who swear falsely, against those who oppress the hired workers in their wages, the widow and the orphan, against those who thrust aside the alien, and do not fear me, says the Lord of hosts.

Ruth 2.10:

Then she fell prostrate, with her face to the ground, and said to him, “Why have I found favor in your sight, that you should take notice of me, when I am a foreigner?”

1 Kings 8:41-43; 2 Chronicles 6.32-33

Likewise when a foreigner, who is not of your people Israel, comes from a distant land because of your name —for they shall hear of your great name, your mighty hand, and your outstretched arm—when a foreigner comes and prays toward this house, then hear in heaven your dwelling place, and do according to all that the foreigner calls to you, so that all the peoples of the earth may know your name and fear you, as do your people Israel, and so that they may know that your name has been invoked on this house that I have built.

Isaiah 56.3:

Do not let the foreigner joined to the Lord say, “The Lord will surely separate me from his people”; and do not let the eunuch say, “I am just a dry tree.”

Isaiah 56.6:

And the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord, to minister to him, to love the name of the Lord, and to be his servants, all who keep the sabbath, and do not profane it, and hold fast my covenant—

Luke 17.18:

Was none of them found to return and give praise to God except this foreigner?”

Deuteronomy 10.18:

[God] who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the strangers, providing them food and clothing.

Deuteronomy 10.19:

You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Deuteronomy 16.11:

Rejoice before the Lord your God—you and your sons and your daughters, your male and female slaves, the Levites resident in your towns, as well as the strangers, the orphans, and the widows who are among you—at the place that the Lord your God will choose as a dwelling for his name.

Deuteronomy 16.14:

Rejoice during your festival, you and your sons and your daughters, your male and female slaves, as well as the Levites, the strangers, the orphans, and the widows resident in your towns.

Psalm 94.6:

They kill the widow and the stranger, they murder the orphan,

Psalm 146.9:

The Lord watches over the strangers; he upholds the orphan and the widow, but the way of the wicked he brings to ruin.

Matthew 25.35:

For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me,

Matthew 25.38:

And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing?

Matthew 25.43:

I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’

Matthew 25.44:

Then they also will answer, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?’

Romans 12.13:

Contribute to the needs of the saints; extend hospitality to strangers.

Hebrews 13.2:

Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that some have entertained angels without knowing it.


The Testing of Jesus



This week as I have been doing my lectio divina on Jesus’ temptation in Matthew 4:1-11, I have made brief forays into the other Gospels to compare the accounts, which are different from each other. Mark 1:12-13 is very brief with no specifications of the nature of the tests. But Mark says that the Spirit “drove” Jesus into the wilderness, while Matthew 4:1 and Luke 4:1 say that the Spirit “led” Jesus into the wilderness. John’s Gospel includes no account of Jesus’ temptation.
We typically call this the “temptation” of Jesus, which is a legitimate translation of the Greek word peirasmos. However, in other contexts (both within and outside of the New Testament) it is properly translated “testing” or “proving.” Using “testing” would seem consistent with the use of hasatan in Job 1-2 as a sort of prosecuting attorney bringing charges against Job and “accuser of our comrades” (NRSV) [“our brethren” RSV,KJV] in Revelation 12:10. Thus, the testing of Jesus may not be so much about tempting him to commit some sin as about challenging his qualifications for the redemptive mission on which he was about to embark.
With that thought in mind, I compared the different order of Jesus’ tests in Matthew and Luke. Matthew has them: stone to bread, leap from pinnacle of temple, worship Satan to have the kingdoms of the world. Luke reverses the second and third so have them: stone to bread, worship Satan to have the kingdoms of the world, leap from pinnacle of temple. I am not at all concerned that this detracts from either the accuracy or significance of the accounts. One curiosity here is that, whatever this was, Jesus experienced it alone (except for the wild beasts and angels, of course). So unless you posit a direct mystical revelation to Matthew and Luke, Jesus must have told them or other disciples about the experience for them to record it in their Gospels. Speculating on that will scramble your brain indefinitely.
However, I am interested in the distinct emphases of Matthew and Luke with this variation in the order of the tests. As I have been focusing on Matthew this week, I have a speculation of the order there. I can’t say that I have seen any scholarly opinion on this, but then I haven’t preached on this passage for six years and am not giving too much attention to commentaries lately. I would, however, be interested in responses from any who read this.
Starting with the hypothesis that the encounter between Jesus and Satan was more about his qualifications for his impending redemptive mission than about luring him into some specific sin, this explanation of Matthew’s sequence has emerged in my mind. Twice Satan challenged Jesus to prove he was the Son of God, qualified for the upcoming mission, by using his divine power. Twice Jesus refused. Is it possible then that Satan is implying to Jesus, “Since you must not be the Son of God, not having used that power, why don’t you worship me and get the power I can give you to rule the world?” Mind you, I am not offering this as an interpretation, only as a pondering to which I invite responses.
I am posting this as an essay in my Writing Workshop rather than my Pilgrim Path explorations of my personal spiritual journey. I haven’t identified what this exploration might (or might not) mean for my own relationship with Jesus. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t one, only that it’s not clear to me at this point. Maybe someone’s response will prompt my awareness of such a connection.


Thursday, February 6, 2020

Mysterious Motivation and Integrity



I am purposely making no comment one way or another on the results of the Senate impeachment trial. Rather I want to explore the depths of the mystery of human motivation and integrity in Mitt Romney’s vote to convict Donald Trump, breaking ranks with fellow Republicans and knowingly invoking the wrath of both party and Trump loyalists. In a time when power and money speak, and everyone is assumed to have their price, the natural question is what would motivate Mitt Romney to vote as he did? He is already being vilified for capitulating to Schumer and Harris, and you know vicious vengeance will come from the White House for perceived disloyalty. What was the pay off? What did he expect to gain? Who could have met his “price” and for what purpose, since it did not affect the outcome of the trial? Does he actually believe this might be to his political advantage?
He cited his faith and integrity, which is already being mocked and ridiculed. Some have attacked the faith as faulty. Some have challenged the idea that faith could or should be given more credence than loyalty to party or country. Some have dismissed faith as a ruse to cover for something more nefarious. Some have questioned the integrity of his vote. I have no way of knowing what is in Mitt Romney’s heart or mind, so instead of criticizing or congratulating him, I want to ponder the depths of the mystery of human motivation and integrity that we all must face.
I am reminded of the line from Kris Kristofferson’s song Me and Bobby McGee. “Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose.” In Mitt Romney’s case, he has four years left in his Senate term. Had he already decided not to run again? Did this vote give him a fresh freedom for those four years since he wouldn’t need party support to run again? Does he have other challenges he wants to make in the time he has left? In my career, I remember a difficult pastoral situation that I had been trying to judiciously finesse for some time. In my “lame duck” weeks, after I had resigned but before moving on, I felt a freedom from the entangling issues, which I purposely did not address, and a number of people said my preaching improved noticeably.
I am also reminded of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was safely in the US when the Nazi regime was becoming increasingly aggressive in silencing and eliminating those considered disloyal. He was encouraged to stay in the US until after the collapse of the Reich, but he chose to return to Germany saying that if he didn't participate in the struggle he would have no right to participate in the rebuilding. So perhaps Romney is willing to sacrifice himself in the short-term to have something to contribute to rebuilding after the inevitable collapse. Bonhoeffer was executed just as the war was almost over and the Reich was on the verge of collapse, so he did not get to be personally involved in the rebuilding. Nevertheless, his influence has persisted for 75 years. Germany’s journey since WWII has been both excruciating and wonderful. Though nothing like the heyday of the state church of “Christian” Germany, for those who imbibed of Bonhoeffer’s call for costly discipleship, it is still instructive. I am convinced that not just Bonhoeffer but the entire struggle for the Confessing Church in the face of the power of the German Christians speaks pointedly to the challenges facing the Church in the US today.
Mitt Romney is not my brand of Christian, nor does he speak my political priorities. Yet, I anticipate that in coming days when any of us who follow Jesus in just about any fashion invoke our faith and the example and teaching of Jesus for speaking and acting in unpopular ways, we can expect to be labeled as disloyal. We can expect to be told that our faith is not authentic, and that it must be subservient to party, politics, and nation. Perhaps the value of Mitt Romney’s vote is a stimulus for each of us to examine our motivations. What price could buy us off? What price are we prepared to pay? What drives us to speak and act? Do we need to adjust our motives? How solid is our integrity? It is vigorous enough to not only speak out but to persist in the face of mockery and ridicule, vilification and vengeance, loss of reputation and voice, abandonment by cherished relationships?


On Mitt Romney's Conviction Vote


The line in the Kris Kristofferson song comes to mind. "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to loose." Perhaps anticipating retirement was the door to freedom. It will be interesting to see what other price he may have to pay as the vindictiveness is likely to be vicious. I am also reminded of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was safely in the US when the Nazi regime was becoming most aggressive. He was encouraged to stay in the US until after they collapse of the Reich, but he chose to return to Germany saying that if he didn't participate in the struggle he would have no right to participate in the rebuilding. So perhaps Romney is willing to sacrifice himself in the short-term to have something to contribute to rebuilding after the inevitable collapse.

Monday, February 3, 2020

Isaiah Organization


In my reflections on Isaiah 58 last week, I was struck by (and posted) how relevant it seemed to our time. Part of that was recognizing how pointedly it spoke to the people of Judah when they returned from the Exile in Babylon. That got me thinking about the scholarly explorations and debates about the structure and authorship of the book of Isaiah. Clearly, chapters 1-39 were a wake-up call to the spiritually complacent time of peace and prosperity in the eighth century BCE during the lifetime of the prophet Isaiah. Chapters 40-54 speak most clearly to their distress and despair during the time of Exile in Babylon. And chapters 55-66 were a word of encouragement and call for renewal as they longed for past glory on returning to the land of Judah after the Exile in Babylon.
I grew up and was educated in a setting that assumed and affirmed that the unity of the book of Isaiah depended on him having been the author of the entire book in the eighth century BCE. That perspective rejected positing two or three Isaiahs as attacks on the integrity and reliability of Scripture. It became a litmus test of orthodoxy (shibboleth – Judges 12:6) that discredited or discounted the scholarship and maybe even faith of any who did not affirm it. I am sure some reading this have already dismissed where I am headed with this by recognizing the structure of the book. Nevertheless, as I have sought to understand and live out the message of Scripture through the years, I have come to posit a question that I believe leaves intact the foundational orthodoxy of the inspiration of Scripture and grasp its full significance for both its original readers and for us.
Though a number of other issues are involved, the references to Cyrus in Isaiah 44:28; 45:1.13 are a kind of watershed in this discussion. Those who argue for the traditional unity of the book as Isaiah’s writing, present this as evidence of God’s wonderful foreknowledge to be able to reveal to a prophet, even centuries in advance, the name of a specific person in salvation history. Those who argue for two or three authors assert that not only would Isaiah not have had any way to know Cyrus’ name, it would have had no meaning for him or his readers. However, Cyrus’ identity was intrinsic to the hope of returning to Judah for those in Exile in Babylon. They also point out, correctly, that after chapter 39, Isaiah’s name in not mentioned nor are there references to persons or events from the eighth century BCE. The text of Isaiah that we have does not have section subheads, nor are manuscripts extant divided into two or three parts, but all of these trace to times well after the relevant times of history.
I do not intend or expect to resolve either the scholarly or faith issues involved in this debate. This, however, is my question. If we affirm that God was able to name a specific person well in advance, could not that same God have been able to raise up prophets within the community of those who kept alive the witness of Isaiah? Could not God have revealed to such prophets messages customize to their time and situation? Would not such prophetic words have the same integrity and authority as the original message with which they are associated?
While the exploration of the issues around how the text of Isaiah came to us in the form we know are fascinating, I am suggesting that getting caught up in debating those issues can be a distraction from recognizing how well focused each section of Isaiah is for each of the stages of Judah’s history. And more importantly, how grappling with those foci empower us to receive the full impact of Isaiah for our own time. For me, understanding how Isaiah 58 spoke to those who were longing for a return of lost glory after returning from Babylon to Judah sharpens our hearing its message in our time of yearning as followers of Jesus in a nation in turmoil.

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Restoration of Greatness



Recently talk about restoration of greatness has been popular in some political circles, and some connect it with recovery of attention to the Bible. Isaiah 58 (the lectionary reading from the Hebrew Scriptures/Old Testament for next Sunday February 9, 2020) is presented as the formula for restoration of reputation. All people of faith, take heed!

Is such the fast that I choose, a day to humble oneself? Is it to bow down the head like a bulrush, and to lie in sackcloth and ashes? Will you call this a fast, a day acceptable to the Lord? Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of injustice, to undo the thongs of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke? Is it not to share your bread with the hungry, and bring the homeless poor into your house; when you see the naked, to cover them, and not to hide yourself from your own kin?
Then your light shall break forth like the dawn, and your healing shall spring up quickly; your vindicator shall go before you, the glory of the Lord shall be your rear guard. …
If you offer your food to the hungry and satisfy the needs of the afflicted, then your light shall rise in the darkness and your gloom be like the noonday. … Your ancient ruins shall be rebuilt; you shall raise up the foundations of many generations; you shall be called the repairer of the breach, the restorer of streets to live in.

Clearly, this was written to ancient Israel in their time of distress. I do not believe the US is, ever was, or ever should be a theocratic (“Christian”) nation, nor do I expect its government leaders to share my faith in Jesus. I do however expect integrity and authenticity, competence and humility. These qualities, and I believe the words of Isaiah 58, are not limited to people who identify themselves as followers of Jesus but speak to profound human qualities and dynamics. Nevertheless, in the current climate of longing for restored greatness, I do believe we who follow Jesus have an opportunity to point the larger society toward true greatness, as Jesus himself described it. (Matthew 18:4; Mark 9:35; 10:43-44; Luke 9:48)

Whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all.